150x150.png)
The 58th Universities’ Transport Studies Group (UTSG) Annual Conference returned to Surrey this week with a quiet confidence, the kind that doesn’t rely on big announcements or headline-grabbing launches, but instead on the depth and direction of the research being shaped across the UK and Ireland’s transport schools. For three days, the sector’s academic community gathered to examine the future of mobility through the lenses of justice, safety, resilience and automation. While UTSG rarely produces traditional “news”, it consistently produces something more valuable, a clarity on where transport research is heading next.
This year, that direction points unmistakably toward Intelligent Transport Systems.
The conference opened with Professor Tim Schwanen’s keynote on Just Urban Mobility Transitions under Uncertainty. It was a timely reminder that the challenges facing transport systems are no longer neatly bounded by engineering or economics. Climate volatility, digital disruption, energy instability and widening social inequality are reshaping the very conditions under which mobility systems operate.
Schwanen’s argument that justice must become a core design principle in future mobility transitions, lands squarely in the heart of the ITS debate. Intelligent systems are only as effective as the public trust they command, and trust is only earned when systems are fair, transparent and responsive to the communities they serve. For ITS Now readers, this is familiar territory, the trust deficit, the need for public acceptance, and the shift from tech-led to people-centred deployment.
UTSG 2026 made it clear that academia is now treating these themes as foundational, not optional.
On the second day, TRL’s Shaun Helman delivered a keynote that felt like a recalibration of the sector’s priorities. As automation accelerates, human factors which were once considered a specialist niche, are rapidly becoming the defining challenge of intelligent mobility.
Helman’s message was simple but sharp, that safety technology does not exist in isolation. It exists in the messy, unpredictable reality of human behaviour. Whether we’re talking about ADAS performance, CAV trials, or the design of multimodal interfaces, the human element remains the critical variable.
For an industry often captivated by sensors, algorithms and connectivity, this was a welcome reminder that the future of ITS will be shaped as much by psychology as by engineering. It also aligns neatly with the conversations happening across Traffex, MOVE and the ITS European Congress, that automation is advancing, but human-centred design is advancing faster.
Professor Bidisha Ghosh’s keynote on Data, Modelling and Resilient Transport Systems added another layer to the emerging narrative. If the last decade was defined by optimisation, the next will be defined by resilience.
Her work highlights a shift in academic modelling priorities, away from efficiency-driven frameworks and toward systems capable of absorbing shocks, adapting to disruption and maintaining continuity across modes. In practice, this means new modelling approaches, new data strategies and new expectations for ITS infrastructure. Resilience is becoming the metric by which digital twins, multimodal networks and climate-aligned ITS deployments will be judged.
Across the programme, Intelligent Transport Systems appeared not as a sub-discipline but as the backbone of contemporary transport research. Sessions on connected autonomous vehicles, traffic management, MaaS, safety, climate resilience and multimodal integration all pointed to the same conclusion that ITS is no longer a future technology, it is the organising framework for modern mobility.
Surrey’s hosting reinforced the UK’s growing role in shaping this research landscape. With strong ties to industry, active CAV testbeds and a maturing ecosystem of mobility innovators, the UK is increasingly positioned as a bridge between academic insight and real-world deployment.
One of UTSG’s most distinctive strengths is its commitment to early-career researchers. The Smeed Prize, PhD mentoring sessions and training workshops showcased a cohort of emerging scholars whose work spans automation ethics, multimodal optimisation, behavioural modelling, climate adaptation and AI-driven network analysis.
For a sector grappling with recruitment challenges, this is more than a conference detail, it’s a strong signal. The next generation of ITS researchers is being shaped around themes that industry urgently needs equity, automation, resilience, data ethics and public trust. As a sector, we have an opportunity to amplify these voices, connect them with industry, and help bridge the gap between academic innovation and operational deployment.
UTSG doesn’t compete with the spectacle of Intertraffic or the scale of the ITS European Congress. It doesn’t need to. Its value lies in the intellectual groundwork it lays, from the ideas, models and frameworks that will underpin the next decade of intelligent mobility.
The story from UTSG is clear:
UTSG 2026 didn’t produce a headline. It produced a direction for a sector navigating uncertainty, that might be the most important news of all.
Click the buttons below to see more articles:
See all ArticlesIndustry InsightEventsITS Thought LeadershipITS Educational